Practice Feedback Program

The Practice Feedback Program (PFP) is a component of the NSPR’s Quality Assurance Program. The PFP is founded on the principle that pharmacists are experts in drug therapy, playing a crucial role in medication management and ensuring appropriateness of therapy. This professional responsibility applies when pharmacists review and dispense prescriptions written by others, as well as when they independently assess and prescribe for their patients.

The PFP operates through a lens of professional development with an emphasis on two-way dialogue and meaningful discussion. The goal is to be supportive rather than punitive, intervening only if a practice is identified that compromises public safety.

The program is informed by the R2C2 Method of Coaching and Feedback, NSPR Standards of Practice, NAPRA Model Standards of Practice, established quality assurance programs used by other Canadian pharmacy regulators, and input from practicing pharmacists.


Primary Objectives of the PFP

Engage with a trained facilitator in supportive, peer-to-peer discussions about your approach to patient care.

Gain key insights into your practice to highlight strengths and identify opportunities.

Proactively identify practice situations that may warrant further assessment or intervention by the NSPR, supporting a continuous approach to quality assurance.

Enables you to self reflect to determine professional development needs.

Sessions Focus on Four Key Areas

  • Patient Assessment: Information gathering, determining appropriateness of drug therapy and decision-making.
  • Monitoring & Follow-Up: Evaluating outcomes and ongoing care plan adjustments.
  • Patient Counseling & Education: Clear, effective patient communication.
  • Documentation: Maintaining comprehensive and up-to-date patient records.

What Participants Are Saying

“I would encourage pharmacists to embrace the experience and see it as a career building experience rather than a potentially punitive one.”

“The interactions and observations were meaningful and constructive in such a way that I could question longstanding assumptions and habits in my work and pinpoint what areas I need to improve.”